Fact based stock research
Fraser & Neave Holdings (KLSE:F&N)

MYL3689OO006

How to read the free ranks

For every stock, we judge its performance against its peers and rank it on a scale of 1 to 100. The higher the rank, the better the stock performs than its peers. And, we do this for six investment strategies:
Value - shows how good of a value the stock is. Green is "inexpensive"; red is "expensive".

Growth - shows a company's growth potential. Green is "high growth" expected; red is "tough times ahead".

Safety - relates to the amount of debt a company has. Green is low debt level; red is high debt level.

Combined Financial - this isn't an average of the first three ranks but rather a consolidated view across several financial indicators. Green = good; red = tread carefully.

(NEW) Sentiment - quantifies professional analyst ratings and holdings as well as market pulse. Green = positive sentiment; red = skepticism (Only available to Premium Subscribers).

(NEW) 360° View - the ultimate rating with all financial and non-financial indicators.

Fraser & Neave Holdings stock research in summary

fn.com.my

ANALYSIS: With an Obermatt Combined Rank of 36 (worse than 64% compared with investment alternatives), Fraser & Neave Holdings (Soft Drinks, Malaysia) shares have somewhat below-average financial characteristics compared with similar stocks. Shares of Fraser & Neave Holdings are low in value (priced high) with a consolidated Value Rank of 29 (worse than 71% of alternatives) and show below-average growth (Growth Rank of 39) but are safely financed (Safety Rank of 64), which means low debt burdens. ...read more

RECOMMENDATION: A Combined Rank of 36, is a hold recommendation based on Fraser & Neave Holdings's financial characteristics. As the company Fraser & Neave Holdings's critical financial metrics exhibit below-average performance, such as low value (Obermatt Value Rank of 29) and low growth (Obermatt Growth Rank of 39), it is a somewhat questionable stock investment, where the risk of paying too much for the shares is significant, unless the company has an exceptionally bright future. In this case, good financing practices (Obermatt Safety Rank of 64) are a positive sign, because it may allow the company to weather challenging times until the hoped-for cash flows materialize. This may be true for high-tech or biotechnology companies with enough cash to sustain prolonged business development. If they own properties that only provide cash flows in the future, the stock may look excessively expensive and unattractive today. In such cases, the Obermatt Method has limited value, as it is based on facts we can observe today. If the facts lie all in the future, stock investing becomes guesswork, and this should only be a driver in a limited number of investments that account for a small fraction of a safe portfolio. Obermatt Premium subscribers can further check the stock’s Sentiment Ranks, which also flow into the Obermatt 360° View for investors. ...read more

Latest Obermatt Ranks


360° View^new
Sentiment Rank^new
Value Rank	29
Growth Rank	39
Safety Rank	64
Combined Rank	36

Country	Malaysia
Industry	Soft Drinks
Index	Low Emissions, Energy Efficient, Independent Boards Growth Markets
Size class	Small

14-Jul-2025. Stock data may be delayed. Log in or sign up to get the most recent research.

Further information

Multiple opinions. One number.

Analysts rarely agree on a stock’s future. So, who do you believe? Obermatt translates those collective views into a single Sentiment Rank. That plus the financial ranks give you the ultimate 360° View. Sign up to access them.

Why popular stocks have low ratings

It’s easier said than done. When your stock drops, it’s easy to want to sell it and find a better performer. Think twice, or even three times, before trading. Those fees (especially the hidden ones) can eat up your gains.

Review the performance ranks of the individual metrics that form each investment strategy.

Research History: Fraser & Neave Holdings

RESEARCH HISTORY	2022	2023	2024	2025
VALUE
VALUE	35	34	39	29
GROWTH
GROWTH	1	45	15	39
SAFETY
SAFETY	93	75	85	64
SENTIMENT
SENTIMENT	89	76	66	^new
360° VIEW
360° VIEW	61	64	54	^new

Most recent update of the stock research: 14-Jul-2025. Financial reporting date used for calculating ranks: 31-Mar-2025. Stock research history is based on the Obermatt Method. The higher the rank, the better Fraser & Neave Holdings is in the corresponding investment strategy.
Upgrade to a Premium Account to access the latest ranks.

Combined financial peformance in Detail

RESEARCH HISTORY	2022	2023	2024	2025
VALUE
VALUE	35	34	39	29
GROWTH
GROWTH	1	45	15	39
SAFETY
SAFETY	93	75	85	64
COMBINED
COMBINED	35	50	39	36

Last update of combined financial performance: 14-Jul-2025. Stock analysis on combined financial performance: The higher the rank of Fraser & Neave Holdings the better the performance.

Value Metrics in Detail

ANALYSIS: With an Obermatt Value Rank of 29 (worse than 71% compared with alternatives), Fraser & Neave Holdings shares are more expensive than the average comparable stock. The Value Rank is based on consolidating four value indicators where three out of four are below average for Fraser & Neave Holdings. Only the Price-to-Book Capital ratio (also referred to as market-to-book ratio) indicates good stock value with a Price-to-Book Rank of 52, which means that the stock price is lower compared with invested capital than for 52% of comparable investments. All other value indicators are below the market median. Price-to-Sales is 40 which means the stock price compared with what market professionals expect for future profits is higher than 60% of comparable companies, indicating a low value concerning Fraser & Neave Holdings's revenue levels. The same is valid for the Price-to-Book Capital ratio (also referred to as market-to-book ratio) with a Price-to-Book Rank of 52 and for the dividend yields rank which is lower than for 70% of comparable companies, making the stock more expensive as regards to with the company's expected dividend payouts. ...read more

RECOMMENDATION: The overall picture with a consolidated Value Rank of 29, is a hold recommendation based on Fraser & Neave Holdings's stock price compared with the company's operational size and dividend yields. Why are market participants paying such a high price for Fraser & Neave Holdings, where three out of four value indicators are below par? One reason could be that the company is well financed, indicated by the high book capital level, and has a promising future that is not yet visible in reported revenues and profits. That would also explain the low dividend yield because the company needs the cash to invest in its future. If investors can verify a picture in this sense, the stock may still be a good investment, even though current company-reported financials don't fully explain current stock prices. We recommend further analyzing the stock with Obermatt’s Value, Safety, and Sentiment Ranks, including the 360° View, before making an investment decision, which is essential in this case, as the financial indicators are inconclusive. ...read more

VALUE METRICS	2022	2023	2024	2025
PRICE VS. REVENUES (P/S)
PRICE VS. REVENUES (P/S)	44	39	45	40
PRICE VS. PROFITS (P/E)
PRICE VS. PROFITS (P/E)	31	33	42	31
PRICE VS. CAPITAL (Market-to-Book)
PRICE VS. CAPITAL (Market-to-Book)	41	47	49	52
DIVIDEND YIELD
DIVIDEND YIELD	37	40	37	30
CONSOLIDATED RANK: VALUE
CONSOLIDATED RANK: VALUE	35	34	39	29

Last update of Value Rank: 14-Jul-2025. Stock analysis on value ratios: The higher the rank, the lower the value ratio of Fraser & Neave Holdings; except for dividend yield where the rank is higher, the higher the yield.

Growth Metrics in Detail

ANALYSIS: With an Obermatt Growth Rank of 39 (better than 39% compared with alternatives), Fraser & Neave Holdings shows a below-average growth dynamic in its industry. There is limited momentum in this company. The Growth Rank is based on consolidating four value indicators, with three out of four indicators below-average for Fraser & Neave Holdings. While Sales Growth ranks at 68, professionals currently expect the company to grow more than 68% of its competitors, while all other growth ranks are below the market median. Profit Growth has a rank of 31, which means that, currently, professionals expect the company to grow its profits less than 69% of its competitors, and Capital Growth has a low rank of 48. Historic stock returns were also below average with a current Stock Returns rank of 45 which means that the stock returns have recently been below 55% of alternative investments. ...read more

RECOMMENDATION: The overall picture with a consolidated Growth Rank of 39, is a hold recommendation for growth and momentum investors. If revenues are expected to increase, but all other growth indicators are negative, the company may be investing in future growth through means not visible in the balance sheet and thus not reflected in capital growth. The fact that Stock Returns have been below market doesn't mean that much, as it may be due to overly optimistic investor behavior in the past, which has been corrected to a more reasonable level recently. If that were the case, a positive Value Rank would be a reason to invest because the company is still expected to grow, while stock prices are now at a more reasonable level. While momentum is a popular investment factor, the value aspect might be the more important one, in the longer term. We recommend analyzing the stock with Obermatt’s Value, Safety, and Sentiment Ranks to arrive at a 360° View of the stock purchase case, especially since the growth performance isn't stellar here. ...read more

GROWTH METRICS	2022	2023	2024	2025
REVENUE GROWTH
REVENUE GROWTH	24	32	45	68
PROFIT GROWTH
PROFIT GROWTH	34	29	38	31
CAPITAL GROWTH
CAPITAL GROWTH	4	36	6	48
STOCK RETURNS
STOCK RETURNS	5	97	31	45
CONSOLIDATED RANK: GROWTH
CONSOLIDATED RANK: GROWTH	1	45	15	39

Last update of Growth Rank: 14-Jul-2025. Stock analysis on growth metrics: The higher the rank, the higher the growth and returns of Fraser & Neave Holdings.

Safety Metrics in Detail

ANALYSIS: With an Obermatt Safety Rank of 64 (better than 64% compared with alternatives), the company Fraser & Neave Holdings has financing practices on the safer side, which mean that their overall debt burden is lower than average. This doesn't mean that the business of Fraser & Neave Holdings is safe, it only means that the company is on the safer side regarding possible bankruptcy, assuming that public reporting is correct. The Safety Rank is based on consolidating three financing indicators, where all three are above average for Fraser & Neave Holdings. Leverage is at 60, meaning the company has a below-average debt-to-equity ratio. It has less debt than 60% of its competitors. Refinancing is at a rank of 51, meaning that the portion of the debt about to be refinanced is below average. It has less debt in the refinancing stage than 51% of its competitors. Finally, Liquidity is also good at a rank of 74, which means that the company generates more profit to service its debt than 74% of its competitors. ...read more

RECOMMENDATION: With a consolidated Safety Rank of 64 (better than 64% compared with alternatives), Fraser & Neave Holdings has a financing structure that is safer than that of its competitors. These three positive financing indicators signal that the company is less likely to default on its debt obligations. However, it also means that its shareholder returns will be more modest if things go well. A low safety means fewer troubles in downtimes and less upside in good times. Investors may not have a debt issue with Fraser & Neave Holdings but they should also compare Obermatt’s Value, Growth, and Sentiment Ranks before making a decision. ...read more

SAFETY METRICS	2022	2023	2024	2025
LEVERAGE
LEVERAGE	98	68	66	60
REFINANCING
REFINANCING	55	61	65	51
LIQUIDITY
LIQUIDITY	94	69	82	74
CONSOLIDATED RANK: SAFETY
CONSOLIDATED RANK: SAFETY	93	75	85	64

Last update of Safety Rank: 14-Jul-2025. Stock analysis on safety metrics: The higher the rank, the lower the leverage of Fraser & Neave Holdings and the more cash is available to service its debt.

Sentiment Metrics in Detail

SENTIMENT	2022	2023	2024	2025
ANALYST OPINIONS
ANALYST OPINIONS	n/a	67	87	^new
OPINIONS CHANGE
OPINIONS CHANGE	79	50	27	^new
PRO HOLDINGS
PRO HOLDINGS	59	82	35	^new
MARKET PULSE
MARKET PULSE	71	61	83	^new
CONSOLIDATED RANK: SENTIMENT
CONSOLIDATED RANK: SENTIMENT	89	76	66	^new

Last update of Sentiment Rank: 14-Jul-2025. Stock analysis on sentiment metrics: The higher the rank, the more positive the sentiment for Fraser & Neave Holdings.
Upgrade to a Premium Account to access the latest ranks.